Abstract:
There has been a structural shift within the world's financial system during the last decade, driven
increasingly by sustainability and climate resilience drivers. This shift is most observable in
national banking systems' green finance strategic reorientation nowhere else as well as in our
country. This thesis examines the Azerbaijan banking sectors interlink between sustainability and
company strategy, particularly the changing role of green finance both as a regulatory imperative
and strategic option.
While green finance is a very active topic worldwide through instruments like the EU Taxonomy
(Council 2020) and IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards (I. S. Board 2023), its localized
definition and application in developing and transition economies remains largely unexplored.
Azerbaijan, a rich hydrocarbon upper-middle-income country (worldbank 2020), has the singular
challenge of reconciling its carbon-footed past economy with ambitions towards a sustainable and
diversified financial system. It is being driven by the Central Bank of the Republic of Azerbaijan
(CBAR) (CBAR, sustainable-finance n.d.), which has issued guidelines and frameworks to include
environmental, social, and governance (ESG) in financial oversight, risk management, and credit
extension.
This study integrates qualitative and quantitative sources, qualitative information is derived from
expert interviews, while quantitative findings are based on secondary statistical data from Central
Bank of Azerbaijan's Sustainable Finance Survey Reports (2023 and 2024) and comprises an
extensive literature review with thematic content analysis of Azerbaijani bank CEOs' CEO,
regulatory official, and sustainability officer interviews. It has two purposes: (1) an examination
of the degree to which the sustainability principles inform firm strategy in the Azerbaijani banking
industry, and (2) an exploration of the degree of effectiveness as well as green finance practice
maturity in the industry. The research draws on three theoretical underpinnings: Stakeholder Theory, which posits that
banks must become more attentive to broader social and environmental expectations; Institutional
Theory, which addresses the influence of norms, regulation, and mimetic pressures on
organizational action; and the Resource-Based View (RBV), with its emphasis on internal
resources and innovation as a source of competitive advantage. The theories enable multidimensional analysis of drivers, barriers, and implications of integration
of sustainability into banking strategy.
Early observations, based on a wide reading of policy reports, regulatory papers, and ESG reports,
find Azerbaijan's banking industry to be in an emerging but gaining momentum stage of embracing
sustainability. CBAR's Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP) and climate stress test
project are the regulatory milestones that say it all for this nation. The partially covered by
commercial banks falls behind in adoption, though. Institutional resistance to change, lack of
domestic expertise, and the unavailability of environment-specific green taxonomies are generally identified as impediments. Banks that have embraced green credit products, ESG risk ratings, and
digital sustainability platforms, however, enjoy reputational gains, enhanced investor
confidence, as well as greater alignment with international development finance best practices.
This research contributes to the scholarship of the academic community in sustainable banking
with one of the pioneering empirical research studies in Azerbaijan—a market that has been
largely overlooked in the global ESG conversation. It provides action guidance to policymakers
who want to bridge the regulatory intent-institutional preparedness gap, and banking CEOs who
want to infuse sustainability into their strategic DNA without compromising profitability or
resilience.
Lastly, the research argues that green finance is no longer an extremist agenda but part of
Azerbaijan's banking's strategic vision in the long run. But if sustainability has to be converted
into practice, it not only needs to be driven through policy but also through profound organizational
change, inter-sectoral collaboration, and ongoing capacity building.