Abstract:
The 1954 Hague Convention and other UNESCO Conventions form the international legal
framework for the protection of cultural heritage during armed conflicts. However, the
ineffectiveness of these Conventions was revealed during the Karabakh war and subsequent 30-
year Armenian occupation when Azerbaijani cultural heritage in Karabakh was systematically
destroyed. The question that this capstone project poses is why the legal framework failed to fulfil
its objective. This paper identifies three main causes that hinder the effectiveness of the
international law in the protection of cultural heritage during armed conflict such as legal gaps
in 1954 Hague and Convention and UNESCO Conventions, legal gaps in safeguarding intangible
cultural heritage, and bias of the international community towards Azerbaijan and the protection
of its cultural heritage. The solutions proposed for each problem are taking legal actions to fill in
the gaps on protection of cultural heritage in armed conflicts existing in Hague and UNESCO
Conventions, conducting in-depth research on the IDPs of Karabakh for identification and
protection of a unique intangible cultural heritage of Karabakh, and a submission of a complaint
against Armenia to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) with regards to protection of
Azerbaijani cultural heritage in Karabakh. Each of these solutions were evaluated using five
criteria of effectiveness, efficiency, equity, feasibility and flexibility. This research heavily relies on
primary data collected from the interviews with experts and secondary data obtained from books,
journal articles, and websites of international and governmental agencies. This study comes to the
conclusion that the government of Azerbaijan, primarily the Ministry of Culture with the support
of other relevant Ministries and agencies, should work on the proposals for the improvement of
the legal framework for the protection of cultural heritage during armed conflicts and present
them to the international community.